Interactions of lots and lots of simple behaviors ... looks good enough to explain insect-type behavior. A more radical hypothesis is that's all there is. Maybe, that's what humans are doing. Humans have evolved from much simpler systems.
Critique Brooks' hypothesis about the possibilities of intelligence from the interaction of lots of simple agents. (200-350 words)
When I think about it, I can almost see myself as being made up of thousands and thousands of little agents, doing stuff Independently. But at the same time I fall back into believing the things about humans that we all believe about humans and living life that way. Otherwise I think that if you analyze it too much life becomes almost meaningless.What is Brooks saying here about consciousness? Would life really be "almost meaningless" if you were the result of thousands of little agents?