NSF Workshop:
Emerging Opportunities of Nanoscience to Energy Conversion and Storage
Section 5: Nanoelectronics for energy conversion
by Stuart Lindsay
The problem: Energy conversion, light to electricity, electricity to fuels and light
to fuels involves electron and hole transfer at the nanoscale. When light is part of the system,
optical processes at the mesoscale (wavelength of light) have to be coupled to
charge transfer on the nanoscale.
This problem is illustrated in Fig. 1. The charge gathering electrodes have to far enough apart
(ca. l)
so that most of the incident light is absorbed, but charge ÔsinksÕ must be
located near (xh) to chromophores so that charge is separated before
recombination occurs.
This
problem is solved, at a significant cost, in high-mobility semiconductor
devices where a (large) depeletion region is used both to generate and separate
charges. In molecular
photovolataics, one successful approach (the Graetzel Cell1) is based on filling the
absorbing space with a TiO2 aggregate that acts as an efficient sink
for electrons generated by dyes attached to the particles. Surprisingly, the injected electrons
can diffuse from particle to particle quite efficiently. Holes are collected by means of a
dissolved redox couple. This
approach requires some loss of potential (i.e., there is a significant voltage
drop along the charge collection pathway) in order to drive rapid charge
separation. Yet another approach
is to nanostructure electrodes so that they are filamentous. This is done either by interspersing nano-filaments
of hole-conducting and electron conducting polymers, or by nanotexturing an
electrode so that its surface consists of filaments that protrude out into the
light-gathering region.2 In all of these devices, the chromophore is, at best, placed close to one
electrode, but remains remote from the other. This ÔgapÕ is illustrated
schematically by the red arrow in Fig. 1. Another limitation of the complex
arrangements (nanowires, aggregates) currently used to put chromophores close
to one electrode make the job of collecting the other carrier much harder. That is because the complex structure
of the one electrode precludes a simple Ôwiring schemeÕ for connection to the
other.
Photonic collection:
New approaches can do much more than just solve the optical
absorption/charge transfer issue described above. There are radical new approaches to light gathering based on
structuring materials at the nanoscale.
To see why this is important, one has to realize that capturing light
with molecules is not easy at the nm-scale, because the optical absorption
cross-section of molecules is much smaller than their physical size. To take a concrete example, the
extinction coefficient for the Q-bands of porphyrin (a prototypical
chromophore) is 2x104M-1cm-1. Given the
maximum possible packing density of these molecules in a monolayer (2.5x1013
molecules/cm2), a stack of 2,400 monolayers would be required to
adsorb 99% of the light incident at the Q-band wavelength of 650nm. This is one source of the length-scale
problem described above.
Photonic assemblies rely on resonant antennas
that have much larger optical cross-sections than their physical
dimensions. These can, in
principle, capture light with enormous efficiency (essentially complete absorption
in a monolayer) focusing the field to hot spots on the array where chromophores
could be placed. Thus a complex light-gathering medium could be replaced with a
designed medium that leaves space for the connection of charge carrying
wires. An example of such a
photonic concentrator was proposed by Li et al.3 and it is illustrated in Fig.
2. It consists of a chain of
self-similar spheres, each having the same plasmon resonance frequency, but,
because their size changes, essentially all the energy trapped by the larger
spehere becomes concentrated in the space between the smaller spheres. The original simulation was based on a
solution of the Laplace equation (a static approach) and the simulation shown
in Fig. 1 was reworked using a full-physics Maxwell Equation solver (Rudy Diaz
– unpublished). The
enhancement is reduced compared to the original calculations, but the central
point remains valid: light may be
gathered much more ÔintelligentlyÕ using engineered nanophotonic
structures. But a way is needed
to make such structures.
Goals for new research
Can rationally-designed systems be assembled with critical
dimensions at both nano- and meso-scale?
This is a key problem in self-assembly.4 We illustrate one approach based on DNA-directed
self-assembly in Fig. 3. DNA
self-assembly uses the specific base-paring of complementary strands of DNA,
combined with DNAÕs ability to form three- and four-way junctions to assemble
three dimensional nanostructures that can cover macroscopic volumes.5, 6 The proposed technology outlined in Fig. 3 mimics the
bacterial photoreaction center (Fig. 3a) by using an antenna structure to
gather light, coupling it to a charge-separation device. In this case, the antenna structure
consists of a resonant ring of metal spheres, located precisely in space by
attachment to a DNA hexagonal lattice (Fig. 3b). The charge separation molecules (detailed in Fig. 3c) are
located by the same DNA lattice so that they sit at high field points in the
antenna structure. At first sight
it might be thought that DNA self-assembly is an outlandish and expensive
approach to problems like this.
However, even at todayÕs lab prices, a 100nM synthesis of DNA (costing
about $40) would tile twenty four square
meters
DNA
self-assembly is just one approach, used here to illustrate the possibilities.
We list below some of the targets for nanoelectronics in this area:
Molecular photovoltaics hold out the prospect of low-cost,
chemistry-based approaches to energy conversion, but there has been little
progress in the 14 years since the first device with significant conversion
efficiency was introduced.1 It is time to take a look at fresh approaches in light of
recent advances in nanoscience.
References
1. OÕRegan,
B. and M. GrŠtzel: A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on
dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films, Nature 353, 737–740 (1991).
2. Law,
M., L. Greene, J.C. Johnson, R. Saykally, and P. Yang: Nanowire dye-sensitized
solar cells, Nature Materials 4,
455-459 (2005).
3. Li,
K., M.I. Stockman, and D.J. Bergman: Self-similar chain of metal nanospheres as
an efficient nanolens, Phys Rev. Lett. 91,
227402-227401-227404 (2003).
4. Boncheva,
M. and G.M. Whitesides: Making things by self-assembly, MRS Bulletin 30, 736-742 (2005).
5. Seeman,
N.C.N.: DNA in a material world, 421,
427-431 (2003).
6. He,
Y., T. Y., Y. Chen, Z. Deng, A.E. Ribbie, and C. Mao: Sequence symmetry as
a tool for designing DNA
nanostructures, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44,
6694-6696 (2005).